Monthly Archives: March 2011

Hubspot’s Marketing Experts on State of Inbound Marketing: Part 1

Hubspot, a leader in Inbound Marketing, recently surveyed 644 companies to ascertain the state of both Traditional Media (print ads, telemarketing, tradeshows, etc.) & Inbound Marketing. As Hubspot defines it: “Inbound Marketing is a set of marketing strategies and techniques focused on pulling relevant prospects and customers towards a business and it’s products.”

This is part 1 of a 13 part series of blog posts that share bite-size portions of Hubspot’s overall report, “The 2011 State of Inbound Marketing.” If you’d like a full copy of the report, feel free to contact me by clicking here or search for the report by name on Google.

VaCSqi2uBnj6zdi3EFg3XpJaojvMud7-22KoNvIHiOwhHDjegsY2m1oIsp0TP3L0soj51LTwugyXawvWQdJNDjFOtbRbycEQ9zlDBl9YQxDofcPeXto

I’m fairly certain that all my clients are going to be happy about this slide! What business owner wouldn’t be happy to hear that the hours they are investing into their corporate social media campaign is going to cost them 62% less per lead?

One of the more interesting points of the Hubspot report was the consistency of the results over the past two years. Their 2010 survey showed a 60% lower cost per lead compared to traditional media. I suppose some may figure they should throw out all their traditional media efforts, and focus more on long tail keyword research. Well, before you cross direct response TV Ads or postcards off the list, keep in mind these tools can effectively create awareness. When you have a new product, service, location, etc, creating awareness is very important.

Where Inbound Marketing comes in is the prospects who are searching online for your services. So, sad but true, you’re best off investing in both categories. At least for now. The good news is you should be able to reduce the cost of traditional efforts by using Inbound Marketing effectively.

 Click this button to Connect

7iaklKiGu1npbAd_CCwTA4SJqVfFhysOLkKADg-vOZBjib9x91_pgp4gqznOjcXa1sdgKZ3dXUwn95hUPvRYXH0q6jP00uJtyF8uLAzUe2qAjp3qAoA

Interested in learning more about how The Association can help you implement enterprise social media and Inbound Marketing? Visit my resources blog for helpful videos  or fill out a request form here.

Canon DSLR 5D vs AF100: Part 2 – ISO 640

There continues to be a lot of buzz about Panasonic’s new AF100 camera, and whether or not it’s going to deal a deathblow to DSLR’s like the Canon 5D MkII. While I think not, there are many applications, from corporate video productions, Indie Films and even commercial productions,  where the AF100 will be a perfect fit. The camera is already in the hands of many video production crews and filmmakers, and reports I’ve seen are very positive. This is the second article in a series of tests on the AF100.

I wanted to see for myself just how the AF100 compares to the 5D in an identical set up, so I got my good friends and fellow DP’s Tom Myrdahl and Jefferson Miller to help me shoot some test footage here in my office at The Association. We’ve all had great success shooting with the 5D, and since Jefferson is the proud new owner of an AF100, we were naturally curious to see how they compare.

The 5D has a Sigma 50mm 1.4 lens, and the AF100 an Olympus Zuiko 14-35 mm f2, attached with a DMW-MA1 Panasonic adaptor.

af100adapteraf100&lens

We called in our good friend, the very talented Jessica Drolet to be our model, and lit her with a 250 watt china ball for a key, a small Lite Panel for fill and a 150 Arri backlight.

This is the second clip in our side by side comparison. We upped the ISO to 640, with the 5D at f2.5 and the AF100 at an f2.

Make sure you select the 720p version.

 

Quicktime streaming versions: www.theassociation.tv/videostore/5DvsAF100_Part2.mov

We decided to stay with multiples of 160 ISO that give the cleanest image in the 5D, and were interested to see how the blacks look once we start cranking up the ISO of both cameras, especially the AF100 at those ISO multiples. In future testing, we will set the ISO on the AF100 at multiples of 200, as 200/400 seem to be its native ISOs.

Having said that, I do really like the look of the blacks on both cameras at these settings, and the AF100 looks really good at 640.

We welcome your comments and questions. Not familiar with the Canon 5D yet?
Get hands-on training at the next Canon Boot Camp.

Look for Part 3 of our series coming soon, where we dial up the ISO to 1250.

Online Visibility and Press Releases, Part III

Trevor Eisenman's Press Release SeriesNote: This is Part III in an seven-part series I’m writing about Press Releases. Press releases are possibly an overlooked item in the enterprise social media toolbox, so I’m going to cover a few points and talk about how I’ve used them successfully for client campaigns.


Search Engines Have Categories
Google, Yahoo and Bing all have a “web” search engine (also called “organic” search, the search field one sees when one goes to these sites to search for information).  They also have their “news” search engine and one typically clicks on “News” to see the latest in that category.

A press release written in an optimized-for-search manner and correctly issued in top performing  newfeeds will appear on page one of both News and information search engines.   The news search engines are continually adding new stories and keep a press release in search results for about 28 days.

The “web” search or organic search also returns the press release in search results within 24 hours of releasing the story. These stay on the search engines indefinitely.  They appear on page one and can stay there for months or years. Depending on what your consumer analysis reveals (your target market might not trust or care about press releases), including press releases in your corporate social media plan might be very beneficial for your message.  

Social Media Search Engines
Bing is the search engine for Facebook, so press releases can also appear in Facebook searches.
Some of the new feeds are also tweeting the story and Google Real-time will show the blogs it also appears in. So you can actually get some social media action without asking for it, due to the search nature many social networking sites.

  Click this button to Connect

Canon 5D vs Panasonic AF100 – Part 1

There continues to be a lot of buzz about Panasonic’s new AF100 camera, and whether or not it’s going to deal a deathblow to DSLR’s like the Canon 5D MkII. While I think not, there are many applications, from corporate video productions, Indie Films and even commercial productions,  where the AF100 will be a perfect fit. The camera is already in the hands of many video production crews and filmmakers, and reports I’ve seen are very positive. This is the second article in a series of tests on the AF100.

I wanted to see for myself just how the AF100 compares to the 5D in an identical set up, so I got my good friends and fellow DP’s Tom Myrdahl and Jefferson Miller to help me shoot some test footage here in my office at The Association. We’ve all had great success shooting with the 5D, and since Jefferson is the proud new owner of an AF100, we were naturally curious to see how they compare.

We called in our good friend, the very talented Jessica Drolet to be our model, and lit her with a 250 watt china ball for a key, a small Lite Panel for fill and a 150 Arri backlight.

Since most of the talk out there is about sensor sizes and bitrates, I was first interested in two things; how the AF100′s 24Mbps bitrate and the depth-of-field of the 4/3 sensor would compare to the 5D’s 44Mbps bitrate and full-frame 35mm still sensor.

Take a look for yourself. (Make sure you select 720p version)

View Quicktime here:  theassociation.tv/videostore/AF100vs5D_Part1.mov

Not surprisingly, the 5D has a more shallow depth-of-field. The AF100 has a very good look and the image holds up well at the 24Mbps bitrate. The 4/3 sensor of the AF100 is very close to 35mm motion picture frame size, so it will have similar depth-of-field characteristics to those film lenses and cameras. I’m surprised at how well they match color-wise and I think images from these cameras would cut together very well.

Be on the lookout for Part 2 coming soon, where we start cranking up the ISO.

Canon Boot Camp Graduates

The Best DSLR Workshop in Town

Below is a list of graduates from The Association 2010 Canon Boot Camps that have received our special Canon certification. A couple of graduates have created videos using a Canon DSLR 5D or 7D, and a link is included next to their name so you may see their work.

We respect the privacy of our students and do not share their personal information. If you wish to contact them for any reason, including jobs or production, please contact our alumni liaison, Tom Murray, at tmurray@theassociation.tv or call us at (818)841-9660, and we will gladly help with your inquiry.


Pro Level I – March 27, 2010

Amy Berg
Heather Welborn
Allene Quincy Anderson
Skott Snider
Chad Slattery
Cathy Wang
Trampas Thompson
Thomas Myrdahl
(video)Boot Camp Cert

Pro Level I – April 10, 2010

Daniel Pearl, ASC
Oscar Alvarez
Loren Roberts

Mike Berkofsky
Charles Jessen
Joe Maxwell
James Boyd
John Smith
Dan Ayers
Michael Ozier
Alice Gu
Mario Signore

Each of our graduates receives a Canon certification of their newfound expertise in DSLR film making.

Pro Level I – April 24, 2010

Jefferson Miller
Christopher Johnson
Stephen Franklin
Eric Haywood
Michael Brewer
Pa Cadichon
Chris Robertson

Pro Level I – May 22

Bob Stevens
Erica Dunton
Richard King
Chad Bonanno
(video)
Geary McLeod, ASC
Chip Bolcik
John Putch
Danny Tolli
Thyrale Thai
James Boyd
Frank Addelia
Richard Handley
Frank Flowers
(video)

Pro Level II – May 29

Robert Stephens
Trampas Thompson
Eric Haywood
John Ames
Bob Stevens
Jefferson Miller
Richard King

Pro Level I – June 26, 2010

Marcelo Lewin
James Wvinner
Austin Reading
Sam Mark
Kristoffer Dios
Oliver Chow
Nile Evans
James O’Keeffe
Ken Montgomery

Pro Level I – July 17th

Armen Meymarian
Jason Knight
Carmella Hatter
Joseph Dufrene
Adrian Castagna
Jeff Weakley
Shawn Pinner
Michael Dean
Vince Giacco
Theresa Hoey
Jacob Hatley
Bradley Smith

Pro Level II – July 31st

Jason Knight
Oliver Chow
Jeff Weakley
Anthony Hemmingway
Armen Meymarian
Carmella Hatter

Pro Level I – August 21st

Daniel Harutunian
David Jellison
Tom Faigh
Kumala Nio
Michael Franks

Pro Level I – October 9th

John Knowles
Francisco Cortinas
Dutch Merrick
Erica Eng

Pro Level I – October 23rd

Neal D. McConnell
Aimee Long
Frank Carlos
David Gasperik
Christopher DelaGarza
Lester Schwartz
Chris Yu
Brandon Doo

Pro Level I – Private Sessions

Robert Stevens (May 27, 2010)
John Ames (May 27, 2010)